Advocacy and Arbitration Across Borders: A Dual Qualified Lawyer’s Path in Dispute Resolution - Ramana Deshmukh

Advocacy and Arbitration Across Borders: A Dual Qualified Lawyer’s Path in Dispute Resolution – Ramana Deshmukh

Ramana Deshmukh is a disputes lawyer and a Dual Qualified Solicitor in both India, England and Wales. His practice focuses on commercial litigation, arbitration, and cross border dispute resolution, with substantial experience before the Supreme Court of India, the Bombay High Court, NCLT, and NCLAT. Trained in the demanding environment of the Bombay Bar, he has developed a meticulous approach to drafting, strategy, and courtroom advocacy, with structured training support from LawSikho contributing to his qualification journey. His dual qualification enables him to navigate matters involving Indian and English law with equal confidence, assisting businesses and individuals in complex domestic and international dispute.

This interview has been published by Anshi Mudgal and The SuperLawyer Team

What early influences shaped your decision to pursue law and drew you toward litigation and dispute resolution?

My decision to pursue law was fundamentally driven by a desire to help people navigate complex and often stressful situations. I was drawn to the law’s power to protect rights and provide a voice to those who need it most. The field of litigation and dispute resolution, in particular, appealed to me as it is the frontline where these principles are put into action. It offers the unique opportunity to advocate for individuals and businesses, crafting compelling arguments not just to win a case, but to achieve a just and tangible outcome that positively impacts their lives and livelihoods. This drive to make a real-world difference is what solidified my commitment to this profession.

What formative experiences in your initial years at the Bombay High Court and your early associate roles, shaped your approach as a disputes lawyer?

My initial years were a steep and invaluable learning curve. I was fortunate to gain hands-on experience from the very beginning, handling a diverse range of matters from summary suits and execution applications to complex arbitrations and corporate litigation. Early exposure to the procedures of the Supreme Court of India, Bombay High Court, City Civil Courts, NCLT, and NCLAT taught me the importance of meticulous preparation and procedural precision. Working on these matters taught me that half the battle before a court of law is won by a well-drafted pleading. It further taught me that while it is extremely important as an attorney to ensure your client’s case is put forth to the best of your ability, an even more important lesson was the duty to remain fair to the court as its officer. Lastly, starting my journey in the Bombay Bar and having the opportunity to brief and work alongside its stalwarts has had an immeasurable impact on shaping my skills in drafting, research, and courtroom advocacy.

Was there a specific case, mentor, or defining moment that strengthened your commitment to litigation and dispute resolution?

While working with and learning from esteemed senior advocates has been a continuous source of inspiration, a particularly defining moment was a case where I represented thirty shop owners before the Bombay High Court. They were facing eviction, and the matter was of immense personal significance to them. We drafted and argued a Civil Revision Application, successfully securing interim protection that prevented their eviction. Seeing the direct and positive impact of our legal intervention on the lives and livelihoods of so many people was profoundly rewarding. That experience reinforced my belief in the power of litigation to protect rights and deliver tangible justice, strengthening my resolve to build a career in this field.

What inspired you to pursue qualification as a Solicitor in England and Wales, and how did the LawSikho support your preparation?

The inspiration to become a dually qualified lawyer came from observing the increasingly global nature of commerce and law. Many commercial contracts and international arbitrations are governed by English law, and I wanted to equip myself with the expertise to advise clients on cross-border disputes seamlessly. This qualification provides a broader perspective and a distinct advantage in navigating multi-jurisdictional legal challenges. For my preparation, platforms like LawSikho were instrumental. They provided a structured curriculum, comprehensive study materials, and mock examinations that were crucial for tackling the rigours of the Solicitors Qualifying Examination (SQE) while managing a demanding professional schedule.

As a dually qualified professional, what are the responsibilities and also challenges you face, and what has been one of your most demanding matters so far?

As a dually qualified professional, my primary responsibility is to offer clients a holistic legal strategy, especially in matters with cross-border elements. This involves understanding the interplay between Indian law and English common law principles. The main challenge is the constant need to stay abreast of legal developments in two major jurisdictions, which requires continuous learning and dedication. One of my most demanding cases involved advising an NBFC in a complex appeal before the Supreme Court of India. The matter concerned securing assets worth more than a hundred crores outside a liquidation estate. The high stakes, intricate legal questions, and the privilege of briefing multiple senior advocates made it an exceptionally challenging and enriching experience.

How do you approach navigating international commercial disputes, and what unique considerations arise when handling matters that intersect multiple legal systems?

My approach begins with a thorough analysis of the contractual framework, focusing on the governing law and jurisdiction clauses. The next step is to build a clear strategy based on a comparative understanding of the applicable legal systems. Unique considerations are plentiful, including navigating conflict of laws principles, understanding the nuances of enforcing foreign judgments or arbitral awards, and managing different procedural rules for discovery and evidence. Cultural differences in negotiation and litigation styles also play a crucial role. Effective collaboration with local counsel in foreign jurisdictions and maintaining clear, transparent communication with the client about these complexities are key to successfully managing such disputes.

How does your dual qualification contribute to your work in commercial litigation and arbitration, and how do you view the future of arbitration in India?

My dual qualification is a significant asset in my practice. It provides me with a deeper understanding of the common law principles that underpin many international commercial contracts and arbitration agreements. This allows me to offer more nuanced advice. It enhances my ability to strategize effectively in cross-border disputes and gives clients greater confidence. I am very optimistic about the future of arbitration in India. With continued legislative support, a pro-arbitration stance from the judiciary, and the growth of arbitral institutions, India is well on its way to becoming a preferred seat for international arbitration.

How do you envision the future evolution of your practice in the coming years and what resources do you use to stay ahead and informed?

In the coming years, I aim to deepen my specialisation in international commercial arbitration and complex cross-border litigation, leveraging my dual qualification to serve a global clientele. I am also keen on developing expertise in emerging areas where law and technology intersect, which present new and exciting legal challenges. To stay informed, I rely on a mix of resources, regularly reading updates from Indian and international law journals. I am a firm believer in continuous education, supplementing my knowledge by reading at least one judgment a day and staying aware of major constitutional rulings from the apex court. A nominal subscription to online legal publications pays multi fold dividends in this regard.

What practical advice would you offer students aspiring to pursue dual qualifications like yours?

My primary advice would be to first build a strong and robust foundation in your home jurisdiction. Practical experience is invaluable and will provide the context for your international qualification. Secondly, be very clear about your motivations. A dual qualification is a significant commitment of time and resources, so ensure it aligns with your long-term career aspirations, whether that’s in international arbitration, cross-border transactions, or another specific field. I would also recommend thorough research into which jurisdiction best complements your practice area. Finally, seek out mentors who have already walked this path. Their guidance can be invaluable in navigating the process and making the most of the opportunities that a dual qualification offers.

Get in touch with Ramana Deshmukh –

1 Comment

  1. Dilip Deshmukh

    Excellent blog I got lot of insights from his writing’s My Best Wishes his future endeavors Regards, Architect Dilip Deshmukh

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *